Source:
AIRMIC (England)
Chief executives, managing directors and other senior business leaders are failing to take crisis preparedness seriously and risk undermining their organisation’s ability to manage crises, according to crisis management experts. These are the findings of a survey carried out by Regester Larkin and Steelhenge, which also identified partners and suppliers as major potential vulnerabilities in a crisis.
Source:
AIRMIC (England)
Chief executives, managing directors and other senior business leaders are failing to take crisis preparedness seriously and risk undermining their organisation’s ability to manage crises, according to crisis management experts. These are the findings of a survey carried out by Regester Larkin and Steelhenge, which also identified partners and suppliers as major potential vulnerabilities in a crisis.
The survey of 170 large companies from 27 countries revealed that while big business appears to understand the need to prepare for a crisis (86% of respondents said they have a crisis management plan and 59% carry out crisis training at least annually), too often senior leaders do not participate in training or crisis exercises. Of the companies that had run crisis exercises in the past year, almost half (45%) had not involved their chief executive.
This was seen as part of a wider problem, with half of respondents identifying a lack of senior management buy-in and support as the biggest challenge of effectively preparing their organisation for crises.
Dominic Cockram, Steelhenge managing director and Regester Larkin director said that if leaders are not fully brought into crisis preparedness, any good work put into crisis structure, process and capability building will be critically undermined. "There is little point attempting to be ‘crisis ready’ when the core individuals responsible for managing a crisis will not know what to do," he explained.
“There may be many reasons why chief executives aren’t able to attend crisis exercises but if you ask any business leader who has had to manage the response to a real crisis, major incident or issue, they will tell you it was time well spent.”
The survey also found that many organisations are failing to identify lessons and learn from experiences. Only 40% of those companies that had responded to crises in the last year said that they review their crisis plans after an incident or issue. Only 13% of companies reviewed plans after a ‘near miss’.
Regester Larkin recommends that after any crisis, the response actions should be reviewed, gaps and weaknesses identified and plans improved. This window of opportunity, when crisis management is high on an organisation’s radar, should be taken to ensure any mistakes are not made again.
In the supplier arena, the survey found that organisations are not involving their key value chain partners in crisis preparedness programmes: less than a third involve them in crisis exercises despite over a third saying that working with partners in a crisis was likely to be a big challenge.
“Crises do not occur in a vacuum,” Cockram added. “We know from experience that one of the most challenging aspects of managing a crisis is to work harmoniously with partners or suppliers, especially when the media and others are looking for a clear ‘villain’. Without involving partners in crisis preparedness programmes, companies are leaving themselves vulnerable and unprepared.”
This was seen as part of a wider problem, with half of respondents identifying a lack of senior management buy-in and support as the biggest challenge of effectively preparing their organisation for crises.
Dominic Cockram, Steelhenge managing director and Regester Larkin director said that if leaders are not fully brought into crisis preparedness, any good work put into crisis structure, process and capability building will be critically undermined. "There is little point attempting to be ‘crisis ready’ when the core individuals responsible for managing a crisis will not know what to do," he explained.
“There may be many reasons why chief executives aren’t able to attend crisis exercises but if you ask any business leader who has had to manage the response to a real crisis, major incident or issue, they will tell you it was time well spent.”
The survey also found that many organisations are failing to identify lessons and learn from experiences. Only 40% of those companies that had responded to crises in the last year said that they review their crisis plans after an incident or issue. Only 13% of companies reviewed plans after a ‘near miss’.
Regester Larkin recommends that after any crisis, the response actions should be reviewed, gaps and weaknesses identified and plans improved. This window of opportunity, when crisis management is high on an organisation’s radar, should be taken to ensure any mistakes are not made again.
In the supplier arena, the survey found that organisations are not involving their key value chain partners in crisis preparedness programmes: less than a third involve them in crisis exercises despite over a third saying that working with partners in a crisis was likely to be a big challenge.
“Crises do not occur in a vacuum,” Cockram added. “We know from experience that one of the most challenging aspects of managing a crisis is to work harmoniously with partners or suppliers, especially when the media and others are looking for a clear ‘villain’. Without involving partners in crisis preparedness programmes, companies are leaving themselves vulnerable and unprepared.”